IEC 62933-2-1 · BESS sizing
Required nameplate kWh accounting for usable DoD window, BoL→EoL capacity fade, round-trip efficiency chain and AC auxiliary loads. LFP · NMC · LTO.
Step-by-step walkthrough of the sizing formula for a utility-scale peak-shaving BESS.
FrameAI integrates IEC 62933 sizing, degradation curves and rack topology into your project pipeline.
View Pricing →C_nameplate = E_required / (DoD × η_RTE) at BoL, then increased so that EoL performance (at 80% SoH after degradation) still meets E_required. The governing (larger) figure is reported.
η_RTE = η_cell² × η_inverter² accounts for cell-level charge and discharge losses plus inverter losses in both directions. Auxiliary loads (HVAC, BMS) are an additional deduction on AC-side energy.
IEC 62933-2-1 provides the unit parameter and testing framework. Degradation curves follow Wang 2014 (LFP) and Schmalstieg 2014 (NMC) empirical fits. LTO uses manufacturer data (N_ref = 15 000 cycles).
C-rate = P_kW / C_kWh. A 1C rate fully charges or discharges the battery in one hour. Exceeding the sustained C-rate limit increases heat generation and accelerates degradation. LFP tolerates 1C sustained; NMC should stay ≤ 0.5C for stationary use.
Using 280 Ah prismatic reference cells (IEC 62619 grade for stationary). Cells are arranged in series to reach ~48V per rack. Rack count = C_nameplate / kWh_per_rack. Container count assumes 16 racks per standard enclosure (~200 kWh).
LTO is preferred for frequency regulation (FCR/aFRR) requiring >1C rates and high cycle counts (>700 cycles/yr). It costs 2–3× more per kWh but tolerates 15 000+ cycles vs. 4 000 for LFP. For peak shaving or solar applications, LFP is typically optimal.